Coding & Development🤖claude🌐universal
done-blocked
skills/done-blocked/SKILL.md
Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.
Quick Start
Install this SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/avelikiy/great_cto/tree/main/skills/done-blocked---
name: done-blocked
description: Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.
when_to_use: |
Apply to every terminal verdict an agent writes — the last line of a spawned agent run, the top of a report file, or the summary appended to a Beads task comment. Specifically:
- architect ARCH doc completion → DONE or BLOCKED
- senior-dev task close → DONE or BLOCKED
- qa-engineer QA report verdict → DONE (PASS) or BLOCKED (FAIL with evidence)
- security-officer CSO audit verdict → DONE (APPROVED) or BLOCKED (findings)
- devops deploy step → DONE or BLOCKED
- l3-support incident triage step → DONE or BLOCKED
- project-auditor audit completion → DONE or BLOCKED
Do NOT force this on intermediate progress pings (those are advisory). Only terminal verdicts.
effort: low
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Bash
paths:
- ".great_cto/verdicts/**"
- "docs/**"
---
# DONE / BLOCKED Reporting Contract
Terminal status is exactly two states, and BLOCKED requires specific evidence — not vague obstruction reports.
## The contract
Every agent's final handoff line is one of:
```
DONE: <one-sentence summary of what shipped>
artifact: <path to report/PR/commit>
next: <who picks this up — pipeline stage, gate, or "pipeline continues">
```
```
BLOCKED: <one-sentence summary of the obstacle>
tried: <what was attempted — file paths, commands, error signatures>
failed_because: <concrete reason — not "unclear", not "complex">
need: <specific unblock — file access, missing config, CTO decision, another agent>
```
## Hard rules
1. **No third state.** "Mostly done", "done with caveats", "almost there" → choose. If caveats exist, the caveat itself decides:
- Caveat is cosmetic / P2+ → **DONE** (file a Beads bug, move on)
- Caveat blocks the next pipeline stage → **BLOCKED** (do not pretend)
2. **BLOCKED requires three fields.** `tried` + `failed_because` + `need`. Missing any field → the verdict is rejected and the agent must re-report. No exceptions for "obvious" cases.
3. **Silence is not DONE.** If the agent stops producing output without a terminal line, the parent / next stage treats it as BLOCKED with `failed_because: silent — no terminal verdict written`.
4. **`failed_because` must be concrete.** These are rejected:
- "environment issue" → say *which* command failed with *what* error
- "tests failing" → say *which* tests and the actual assertion message
- "unclear requirements" → say *which* decision is needed and the two options
- "not enough context" → say *which* file / doc / config you tried to read
5. **`need` names a specific unblock.** These are rejected:
- "more information" → ask one specific question
- "help from another agent" → name the agent (architect / security-officer / …)
- "CTO approval" → state the exact choice (approve gate X, pick option A vs B, waive check)
## Where the verdict goes
Every agent writes the verdict to **two places**:
1. **Last line of agent output** (visible to the orchestrator that spawned it).
2. **`.great_cto/verdicts/<agent>-<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>.log`** — append-only audit trail.
```bash
mkdir -p .great_cto/verdicts
VERDICT_FILE=".great_cto/verdicts/<agent>-$(date -u +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S).log"
printf '%s\n' "$VERDICT_LINE" > "$VERDICT_FILE"
```
## Examples
**Good — DONE:**
```
DONE: CSO audit passed — 0 P0, 2 P1 findings filed as Beads tasks.
artifact: docs/security/CSO-2026-04-19.md
next: gate:ship ready for CTO approval
```
**Good — BLOCKED:**
```
BLOCKED: senior-dev cannot claim task BD-42 — circular dependency with BD-38.
tried: bd ready → BD-42 did not appear; bd dep tree BD-42 → shows BD-38 blocks BD-42, BD-42 blocks BD-38
failed_because: both tasks depend on each other transitively (BD-42 → BD-38 → BD-39 → BD-42)
need: architect to split BD-39 into two tasks so the cycle breaks
```
**Rejected — vague BLOCKED:**
```
BLOCKED: couldn't finish QA — environment problems.
tried: ran tests
failed_because: stuff broken
need: help
```
Why rejected: `tried` lacks command/path; `failed_because` is tautological; `need` is not actionable.
## Measuring the contract
`.great_cto/verdicts/*.log` is machine-readable. Weekly digest can compute:
- `DONE:BLOCKED` ratio per agent — too many BLOCKED from one agent = that role is under-resourced or prompt is unclear
- `failed_because` clustering — if the same reason appears 3+ times, that's a recurring obstruction worth a meta-fix (tooling, doc, skill)
- Silence rate (agents with no terminal verdict written) — should trend to zero
## Anti-patterns
- Writing both DONE and BLOCKED in the same report ("DONE but blocked on X"). Pick one. If you're blocked, the work isn't done.
- Using DONE as a politeness signal when the gate still fails. The verdict is for the machine, not the CTO's feelings.
- Writing the verdict only to stdout without persisting to `.great_cto/verdicts/`. The audit trail is what makes the contract measurable.
Repository
103stars
13forks
Details
Related Skills
More coding & development skills you might like
Reticle
Coding & DevelopmentAI agents can generate code, but still struggle to understand what they build. Reticle brings Jev-style machine-native runtime perception to web & desktop applications.
🤖claude🌐universal
1.2k
190
View
agentscope-java
Coding & DevelopmentExpert Java developer skill for AgentScope Java framework - a reactive, message-driven multi-agent system built on Project Reactor. Use when working with reactive programming, LLM integration, agent orchestration, multi-agent systems, or when the user mentions AgentScope, ReActAgent, Mono/Flux, Project Reactor, or Java agent development. Specializes in non-blocking code, tool integration, hooks, pipelines, and production-ready agent applications.
🌐universal
6.0k
1.5k
View
ospec
Coding & DevelopmentDocument-driven OSpec workflow for initialization, change/goal routing, validation, archiving, and durable project knowledge.
✨gemini🤖claude💬gpt🌐universal
396
28
View
misakanet-failure-memory
Coding & Development📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. Python stdlib only. | https://misakanet.org
🤖claude⌨️cursor🌐universal
424
158
View