Research & Analysis๐คclaude๐ฌgpt๐universal
marketing-competitive-analysis
apps/tandem-desktop/src-tauri/resources/skill-templates/marketing-competitive-analysis/SKILL.md
Legacy fallback for broad competitor intelligence. Prefer competitor-alternatives for conversion-focused comparison and alternative page execution. Use this template when a wide market landscape brief is explicitly requested.
Quick Start
Install this SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/frumu-ai/tandem/tree/main/apps/tandem-desktop/src-tauri/resources/skill-templates/marketing-competitive-analysis--- name: marketing-competitive-analysis description: Legacy fallback for broad competitor intelligence. Prefer competitor-alternatives for conversion-focused comparison and alternative page execution. Use this template when a wide market landscape brief is explicitly requested. --- # Competitive Analysis Skill Frameworks and methodologies for researching competitors, comparing positioning, and identifying market opportunities. ## Competitive Research Methodology ### Research Sources Gather intelligence from these categories of sources: #### Primary Sources (Direct from Competitor) - **Website**: homepage, product pages, pricing, about page, careers - **Blog and resource center**: content themes, publishing frequency, depth - **Social media profiles**: messaging, engagement, content strategy - **Product demos and free trials**: UX, features, onboarding experience - **Webinars and events**: topics, speakers, audience engagement - **Press releases and newsroom**: announcements, partnerships, milestones - **Job postings**: hiring signals that reveal strategic priorities #### Secondary Sources (Third-Party) - **Review sites**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt รขโฌโ customer sentiment themes - **Analyst reports**: Gartner, Forrester, IDC รขโฌโ market positioning and category placement - **News coverage**: TechCrunch, industry publications รขโฌโ funding, partnerships, narrative - **Social listening**: mentions, sentiment, share of voice across social platforms - **SEO tools**: keyword rankings, organic traffic estimates, content gaps - **Financial filings**: revenue, growth rate, investment areas (for public companies) - **Community forums**: Reddit, Discourse, industry Slack communities รขโฌโ user sentiment ### Research Process 1. **Set scope**: define which competitors and what aspects to analyze 2. **Gather data**: systematically collect information from sources above 3. **Organize findings**: structure by competitor, then by dimension 4. **Analyze patterns**: identify themes, strengths, weaknesses, and trends 5. **Compare to your position**: map findings against your own positioning and capabilities 6. **Synthesize insights**: extract actionable takeaways and opportunities 7. **Date-stamp everything**: competitive intelligence has a short shelf life ### Research Cadence - **Deep competitive analysis**: quarterly (full research across all sources) - **Competitive monitoring**: monthly (scan for new announcements, content, messaging changes) - **Real-time alerts**: ongoing (set up alerts for competitor brand mentions, press, job postings) ## Messaging Comparison Frameworks ### Messaging Matrix Compare messaging across competitors on key dimensions: | Dimension | Your Company | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | | ------------------------ | ------------ | ------------ | ------------ | ------------ | | Tagline/Headline | | | | | | Core value proposition | | | | | | Primary audience | | | | | | Key differentiator claim | | | | | | Tone/Voice | | | | | | Proof points used | | | | | | Category framing | | | | | | Primary CTA | | | | | ### Value Proposition Comparison For each competitor, document: - **Promise**: what they promise the customer will achieve - **Evidence**: how they prove the promise (data, testimonials, demos) - **Mechanism**: how their product delivers on the promise (the "how it works") - **Uniqueness**: what they claim only they can do ### Narrative Analysis Identify each competitor's story arc: - **Villain**: what problem or enemy they position against (status quo, legacy tools, complexity) - **Hero**: who is the hero in their story (the customer? the product? the team?) - **Transformation**: what before/after do they promise? - **Stakes**: what happens if you do not act? ## Content Gap Analysis ### Content Audit Comparison Map content across competitors by topic and format to identify gaps and opportunities. | Topic/Theme | Your Content | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap? | | ----------- | ---------------- | -------------------- | ---------------- | ----------------- | | [Topic 1] | Blog post, ebook | Blog series, webinar | Nothing | Opportunity for B | | [Topic 2] | Nothing | Whitepaper | Blog post, video | Gap for you | | [Topic 3] | Case study | Nothing | Case study | Parity | ### Identifying Content Opportunities 1. **Topics they cover that you do not**: potential gaps in your content strategy 2. **Topics you cover that they do not**: potential differentiators to amplify 3. **Formats they use that you do not**: format gaps that could reach new audiences 4. **Audience segments they address that you do not**: underserved audiences 5. **Search terms they rank for that you do not**: SEO content gaps ## Positioning Strategy ### Positioning Statement Framework For your company and each competitor, define their positioning statement: > For [target audience], [product/company] is the [category] that [key benefit/differentiator] because [reason to believe]. ### Positioning Map Plot competitors on a 2x2 matrix using the two most important dimensions for your market (e.g., Price vs. Capability, Ease of Use vs. Power). ### Category Strategy - **Create a new category**: define and own a new category (high risk, high reward) - **Reframe the existing category**: change how buyers evaluate the category - **Win the existing category**: compete directly on recognized criteria - **Niche within the category**: own a specific segment or use case ## Battlecard Creation ### Battlecard Structure A competitive battlecard is a one-page reference for sales and marketing teams. #### Quick Overview - What they do (one sentence) - Their target customer - Pricing model summary - Key recent developments #### Strengths and Weaknesses - **Strengths**: where they genuinely compete well - **Weaknesses**: customer complaints, technical limitations, gaps in offering #### Our Differentiators - 3-5 specific ways your product or approach is different - For each: the differentiator, why it matters, and proof #### Objection Handling | If the prospect says... | Respond with... | | ------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | | "[Competitor] does X too" | "Here is how our approach differs..." | | "[Competitor] is cheaper" | "Here is what that price difference gets you..." | #### Landmines to Set Questions to ask prospects that highlight your advantages: - "How do you currently handle [area where competitor is weak]?" - "How important is [capability you have that they lack]?"
Repository
121stars
14forks
Details
Related Skills
More research & analysis skills you might like
pr-improver
Research & AnalysisRuns an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over the current branch's changes until a PR review comes back clean, scoped mechanically to the directories the branch touched. Reviews are performed by an installed PR-review skill (default: pr-review-toolkit's review-pr). Use to fix review findings on a branch before opening or updating a pull request ('clean up this branch', 'fix this PR until review passes', 'run review-and-fix on my changes'). NOT for a one-time review โ run the PR-review skill directly.
๐คclaude๐universal
7.5k
643
View
code-improver
Research & AnalysisRuns an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over any code target โ a skill, plugin, module, or directory โ using a reviewer the user names: any installed skill or agent. Keeps a cross-round findings ledger, escalates when fixes stop converging, and guards scope mechanically. Use when asked to 'improve this code until review passes', 'run an improvement loop with <reviewer>', or to iterate review-and-fix with a specific reviewer. For skills prefer the skill-improver entry; for a branch prefer pr-improver.
๐คclaude๐universal
7.5k
643
View
skill-improver
Research & AnalysisRuns an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review โ use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.
๐คclaude๐universal
7.5k
643
View
audit-augmentation
Research & AnalysisAugments Trailmark code graphs with external audit findings from SARIF static analysis results, weAudit annotation files, and version-gated Trailmark 0.4.x binary-analysis graph exports. Maps findings to graph nodes by file and line overlap, creates severity-based subgraphs, and enables cross-referencing findings with pre-analysis data (blast radius, taint, etc.). Use when projecting SARIF results onto a code graph, overlaying weAudit annotations, importing binary graph findings, cross-referencing Semgrep, CodeQL, or binary-analysis findings with call graph data, or visualizing audit findings in the context of code structure.
๐universal
7.5k
643
View