Search: "claim"

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Searches and reads biomedical papers, FDA/PMDA/EMA documents, clinical trials, and protein records with the GXL Paperclip CLI and Python SDK. Supports source-scoped search, full-text grep, metadata SQL, map/reduce extraction, figure analysis, optional repositories and claim verification, and line-pinned citations. Use when a task names GXL paperclip, asks to install or authenticate it, or requests literature retrieval and evidence extraction through Paperclip.

Prepares evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.

Converts neuroscience acquisition data to Neurodata Without Borders files with NeuroConv and PyNWB, preserves metadata and timebases, checks evidence-based clock alignment, and produces schema validation, NWB Inspector findings and round-trip checks. Use for NWB conversion and synchronization of planar single-channel two-photon TIFF imaging plus timestamped behavioral position CSV; this skill does not perform spike sorting or claim tested support for arbitrary acquisition formats.

Searches BGPT scientific papers by topic or DOI and retrieves claim-level evidence extracted from full text, including experiments, reported statistics, scope, limitations, and provenance. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details beyond abstracts.

Formulates evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready analysis plans. Used when turning observations or preliminary findings into transparent, testable research plans without treating hypotheses as facts.

Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.

Plan and draft competitor comparison and alternative-page strategies for SEO and sales evaluation use cases. Use for "[competitor] alternatives", "you vs competitor", and comparison-page content architecture. Produce deterministic outputs under scripts/marketing/<slug>/ with verified claim handling.

Every claim machine-checked, including "zero runtime daemon" — governed skills, rules and replayable state. One contract, every host agent.

> A local-first, CLI-first open-source personal research agent. > Chat in your terminal (like Codex / Claude Code) to do grounded, cited literature Q&A, > research ideation, scientific figures, paper writing & review — with an auditable > hypothesis→claim→evidence trail, a reproducible run ledger...