Search: "think"

Applies the DHDNA framework as an exploratory rubric for reasoning and writing patterns in supplied text. Used for explicit requests for DHDNA, cognitive-style reflection, a thinking-pattern profile, or comparisons of textual reasoning. Scores describe evidence in the sample, not validated psychological traits or personal identity.

Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.

Structures a multi-perspective council exercise for decisions, research trade-offs, and creative challenges. Simulates thinking archetypes, separates evidence from assumptions and values, and synthesizes a conditional recommendation. Use when the user requests a council, panel, devil's advocate analysis, "mind council", or deliberate comparison of perspectives on a difficult choice.

turn old phones into ai agents - give it a goal in plain english. it reads the screen, thinks about what to do, taps and types via adb, and repeats until the job is done.

MindOS is a Human-AI Collaborative Mind System, where human thinks and agents act. Globally sync your mind for all agents: transparent, controllable, and evolving symbiotically.

Strategic-risk analysis skill for AI agents producing decision-ready memos on geopolitics, sanctions, trade, regulation, and strategic risk with explicit evidence boundaries, uncertainty, scenarios, actor incentives, trade-offs, and watch-next indicators. Use for a country risk brief, policy memo, sanctions or export-control exposure assessment, trade or regulatory implications memo, geopolitical scenario brief, strategic implications note for leadership, stakeholder and incentives analysis, a red-team challenge to an existing policy or risk view, or a decision briefing pack for founders, operators, investors, NGOs, compliance teams, policy teams, or leadership. Do not use for a simple news recap, encyclopedia-style overview, academic literature review, legal advice, intelligence-style certainty, decorative analysis, or unsupported quantitative forecasting.

A personal decision engine with 16 independent AI agents, checks and balances, and swappable cultural themes. Covers relationships, finance, learning, execution, risk control, health, and infrastructure. Use when facing complex personal decisions (career change, investment, entrepreneurship, relocation, life planning), needing multi-angle analysis, periodic reviews, or systematic life management. Trigger keywords: analyze, plan, multi-angle, review, start session, debate. Even without explicit keywords, suggest this skill whenever multi-dimensional thinking or major decisions are involved. Not for simple Q&A, translation, or single-step tasks.

The essential safety and workflow layer that every Claude Code user installs first and never thinks about again.

Agentic-first Cursor Rules powered by MiniMax M2 — clarify-first prompting, interleaved thinking, and full tool orchestration for production-ready AI coding

🧬 Agentic Programming — Python functions that think. | 会思考的 Python 函数。 A paradigm where Python and LLM co-execute functions. | Python 与大模型协同执行的编程范式。